This category is really large. Maybe we should divide it into Wizards and Witches to be more specific.--Lord Opeth 18:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I actually like it the way it is. It's an easy way to see every magical person. -- Freakatone Talk 18:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- No need to split it into Wizards and Witches - we have Category:Males and Category:Females. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 07:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Cavalier One. We already have two categories which divide characters based on gender. If we wanted to be more gender neutral, though, I suppose could change "Wizards" to "Magi" — but that isn't canonical terminology. -Starstuff 12:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Me Potter Fan and I started... I got A-E done and Me Potter Fan got M-N. But, I've gotta go now, can anyone else help? -- Freakatone Talk 12:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Cavalier One. We already have two categories which divide characters based on gender. If we wanted to be more gender neutral, though, I suppose could change "Wizards" to "Magi" — but that isn't canonical terminology. -Starstuff 12:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- No need to split it into Wizards and Witches - we have Category:Males and Category:Females. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 07:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Why has this been split? As stated, we already have categories for gender, so it seems pointless to split this one. And Magi is not a canonical term, and will be deleted. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 12:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, shoot! I misread it as "No, we need to split it". *freakatone smacks himself in the head at his own stupidity*! Ack! all that wasted time :(... what a dumb thing to do..... :( -- Freakatone Talk 13:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think that the name should at least be changed to Witches and Wizards because Wizards is male. Me_Potter_Fan (Talk) 14:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, good idea. Maybe DarkJedi could run his bot and do that? -- Freakatone Talk 15:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, this is ridicolously long. It should be split. TurboGolf
Could it be renamed because it would be more accomadating to Withces. Kerry Stapleton (talk)
- Coudln't the category just be renamed "Wizardkind", the name the article about wizards and witches already uses? --Lukas Exemplar (talk) 00:07, November 15, 2016 (UTC)
Capitalisation of wizard?[]
I didn't know "wizard" was capitalised in the books? Lukas Exemplar (talk) 00:04, November 15, 2016 (UTC)
Too vague[]
This category is too generic. Adding pages directly to it will make it really large. There is no need to that if pages are already included in subcategories e.g. if a page is already in Category:Hogwarts students, there is no need to include here too since all Hogwarts students are wizards. So I suggest removing articles added directly to it, unless there is really very few information about the wizard. - Esbonl (talk) 01:18, June 19, 2018 (UTC)